Medical Malpractice - Understanding When You Have A Case
April 30th, 2008Most of us take our health for granted until something goes wrong. Even a small amount of pain can dampen your day, so a serious injury can quickly rearrange your whole life. When that injury is not just an accident, but the result of your doctor’s poor choices or negligence, trying to overcome the experience can be incredibly frustrating. If you suspect that the behavior of your medical professional actually hurt you rather than healed you, you may be eligible to pursue compensation for your loss.
Any area of law is full of complications and details, and medical malpractice is no exception. In fact, these cases are among the most difficult to win. So if you have questions about whether your situation may be eligible, read on for a simple explanation of the main factors at play in your potential medical malpractice lawsuit.
Firstly, it is important to understand that not every imperfect outcome of medical treatment qualifies as medical malpractice. Due to the delicate and often mysterious behavior of the human body, medicine is considered almost as much an art as a science when it comes to the law. There can be multiple ways to go at a problem, often with no route ‘better’ than another. Doctors and nurses are expected to use their best judgment, but even this does not guarantee ideal results. Responsible and irresponsible behavior can both have negative results, which is what makes negligence so incredibly difficult to prove.
However, despite the subjectivity that is often a part of the medical process, there are still many standards within the medical profession. Since there is usually no hard line between ‘right’ and ‘wrong’, malpractice is generally measured based on the accepted standard of care for a medical professional’s peers. This means that while doctors have some leeway to perform as they see fit, they do go through medical school for a reason and are expected to heed what they learn there.
So, for example, if your doctor takes 8 months to correctly diagnose your illness when their peers would have taken 2, or if your doctor prescribes a drug that is known as harmful to patients with your condition, malpractice may have occurred. If other doctors are willing to stand up and show that your doctor behaved in a way that deviated from the standard of care, you have the first of the two major components necessary for a medical malpractice lawsuit.
The second necessary component is to show that your doctor’s action (or failure to act) is a direct cause of the ultimate injury. Because the body can be unpredictable, and because patients often have multiple conditions and factors at play, this can also be quite difficult to prove. As with proving negligent behavior in the first place, a medical malpractice attorney can draw on research and peer testimony to establish a connection between your doctor’s actions and your injury.
In sum, if your doctor behaves in a way that their highly-trained peers perceive as inappropriate or misguided, and if that behavior ends up harming you, you may be eligible to receive compensation for your doctor’s negligent actions. But keep in mind that this is only an introductory explanation. It is always advisable, if you suspect you have been harmed, to speak directly with a New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer about the specifics of your case.
In some cases, what may seem like a strong case may turn out to be, in which case an experienced attorney will give you an honest answer. But in many other cases, you may find that you have more recourse under the law than you first expected. As a parting thought, remember that if ever you suspect your doctor is not giving you the treatment you deserve, it is never a bad idea to seek a second opinion from another physician.
Posted in Medical Malpractice Expert |